PDA

View Full Version : Round 2173 results


mshefler
January 16th, 2011, 08:58 PM
Well, this has been an interesting round, to say the least. Johnny Barrs posts his def and
his possible DQ publicly, which he was not, according to my dictionary. Notwithstanding, he
gets 3 votes. I wasn't going to comment on it because some people had already submitted definitions
similar to those John thought he was DQ on and if I say that he is not, then he will know not to vote
for those defs. Then Guerri Stevens submitted a def exactly the same as the real def in one of the
dictionaries I referenced. And then Tim Lodge voted twice, for different defs (I used the first one).
And if that weren't enough, Froma's dixonary program suddenly decided it didn't like multiple submitters
for the same def, so I had to score the round by hand. In any case, Paul Keating is the clear winner
and dealer for the next round.

1. idle; resting; indolent.
Submitter: Dictionary Vote: N/A D4
Submitter: Stevens Vote: 11 & 14 0 + 4 = 4
Voted for by:

2. an eavesdropper.
Submitter: Crom Votes: 8 & 11 0 + 4 = 4
Voted for by:

3. a worshiper whose presence is hired or otherwise compensated.
Submitter: Emery Vote: N/V 0 + 3 = 3
Voted for by:

4. a. at leisure; retired. b. _Cambridge Univ._ a visiting scholar with
no teaching commitments.
Submitter: Keating Vote: 1* & [4] 2 + 6 = 8
Voted for by:

5. delicate; fragile.
Submitter: Schultz Vote: 3 & 4 0 + 0 = 0
Voted for by:

6. able to hear; hearing; having the ability to sense and process sound.
Submitter: Savage Vote: N/V 0 + 1 = 1
Submitter: Bourne Vote: 2 & 14 0 + 1 = 1
Submitter: Weltz Vote: N/V 0 + 1 = 1
Voted for by:

7. the slope of a side of a mountain or mountain range.
Submitter: Carson Vote: 2 & 4 0 + 1 = 1
Voted for by:

8. a supplicant.
Submitter: Barrs Vote: N/V 0 + 3 = 3
Voted for by: Crom; Abell

9. blind; unable to see (c. 1975 meaning "hearing").
Submitter: Cunningham Vote: 4 & 6 0 + 1 = 1
Voted for by:

10. a person appointed to carry the censer at religious ceremonies.
Submitter: Lodge Vote: 4 & 7 0 + 1 = 1
Voted for by: Abell

11. uplifting.
Submitter: Morgan Vote: 8 & 9 0 + 3 = 3
Voted for by: Crom

12. a garment of sackcloth worn at an auto-da-fé of the Spanish
Inquisition by condemned heretics, being yellow with red crosses for
the penitent and black with painted flames and devils for the
impenitent.
Submitter: Widdis Vote: 3 & 11 0 + 0 = 0
Voted for by:

13. a non-irritating, sterile solution for dissolving ear wax.
Submitter: Graham Vote: 1* & 3 2 + 0 = 2
Voted for by:

14. shining out; radiant.
Submitter: Madnick Vote: 1* & 2 2 + 2 = 4
Voted for by:

No def: Abell Votes: 8 & 10 0 + 0 = 0

No def: Grieco Votes 1* & 4 2 + 0 = 2

Guerri Stevens
January 17th, 2011, 06:10 AM
What's interesting is that sometimes I am at a loss for a definition and
I pick up a dictionary, open at random, and choose a definition from
whatever page I happen to hit. This was one of those times!

Inquiring minds want to know: what if I'd voted for my own definition,
as people do sometimes? Would I get the 2 points????????

Guerri

mshefler wrote:
> ...
> Then Guerri Stevens submitted a def exactly the same as
> the real def in one of the
> dictionaries I referenced.

Paul Keating
January 17th, 2011, 10:52 AM
No. The rules about combined definitions are cumbrous and disorganized, but the overriding principle is that you never get points for voting for your own definition, nor for a combined definition that incorporates your definition. The “Real†Rules at rules.dixonary.net explains how dealers have interpreted the scoring rules in practice.

-----Original Message-----
From: Guerri Stevens

Inquiring minds want to know: what if I'd voted for my own definition, as people do sometimes? Would I get the 2 points????????