Round 2102 - IGGRI

[Daniel Widdis]

It seems I've managed exactly 50 rounds since my last deal. But I'll venture back a few hundred more rounds for inspiration. Consulting the used words list, it seems I dealt IGG in round 1177. But what I did not deal was:

*** IGGRI ***

As usual, capitalization is not significant.

Please send me your fabulous, fanciful, fake, fictitious, fairy-tale, fabricated, false, fantastical, forged, fabled, far fetched, fraudulent, flim flam, feigned, fanatical, and figmental definitions by private reply to this message.
- Users of the Tapcis Forum at www.tapcis.com may click on my name and "Send email to Daniel Widdis".
- Mailing list players may email me at: widdis@gmail.com

Please include either IGGRI or 2102 in your subject line to reduce the chances that I'll miss your definition.

Definitions will be collected until Midnight PDT at the end of Monday, May 4, which is approximately 34 hours from now. (That's 3am EDT, 07:00 UTC/GMT, and 17:00 on Australia's east coast on Tuesday.)

[Dave Cunningham]

Having the same ipinion

Dave

[Dodi Schultz]

> As usual, capitalization is not significant.
>

Actually, sometimes it is. I know we discussed this recently. Sometimes,
the real def does turn out to be a proper noun--as, f'r instance, round
2099, when it was the name of a Vedic god.

We could, of course, agree on a no-proper-nouns amendment to the rules,
but as of now, I don't think there is one.

--Dodi

[Paul Keating]

I think there is no conflict between "as usual, is not" and "sometimes is".

--
Paul Keating
The Hague

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dodi Schultz" <DodiSchultz (AT) nasw (DOT) org>
To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] Round 2102 - IGGRI


>
>
> > As usual, capitalization is not significant.
> >
>
> Actually, sometimes it is.

[Daniel B. Widdis]

DW> As usual, capitalization is not significant.

DS> Actually, sometimes it is.

Hence the word "usual" as opposed to "always".

DS> We could, of course, agree on a no-proper-nouns amendment to
DS> the rules, but as of now, I don't think there is one.

I don't think there's any formal process for amending the rules in any case,
which is why we're still playing with the ones with numerous flaws in them,
including (but not limited to) the five-round rolling scores including the
just-completed round. ;)

--
Dan

[Dodi Schultz]

Dan Widdis wrote:

> DW> As usual, capitalization is not significant.
>
> DS> Actually, sometimes it is.
>
> Hence the word "usual" as opposed to "always".
>

Ya got me, Dan'l. You're right.

--Dodi

[Dodi Schultz]

Paul Keating wrote:

> I think there is no conflict between "as usual, is not" and

You (and he) are right. I was wrong.

--Dodi

[Toni Savage]

*-- Toni Savage



----- Original Message ----
From: Daniel B. Widdis <widdis (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
Sent: Sun, May 2, 2010 9:05:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Dixonary] Round 2102 - IGGRI

*-----------------------

I don't think there's any formal process for amending the rules in any case,
which is why we're still playing with the ones with numerous flaws in them,
including (but not limited to) the five-round rolling scores including the
just-completed round. ;)

--
Dan