[Dixonary] New word???

[Dodi Schultz]

Thanks for confirming, Dan!

(And on this pass, I see that we now have a new word.)

--Dodi

[Dodi Schultz]

I think it's well over 30 hours since Paul posted results of round 2109.

Has anybody seen a new word?

--Dodi

[Dave Cunningham]

No word showing for me yet.

Dave

[Paul Keating]

No. I got an automated ack for the winner notification I sent when I posted
the results, so Johnny is aware that the deal is his. That ack arrived at
20h29 GMT on Sunday evening 30/5.

Today is a UK bank holiday so Johnny may have been away for the weekend.

--
Paul Keating
The Hague

----- Original Message -----
From: Dodi Schultz
To: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:39 PM
Subject: [Dixonary] New word???



I think it's well over 30 hours since Paul posted results of round 2109.

Has anybody seen a new word?

--Dodi

[JohnnyB]

Interesting -- I posted a new word at 9:39 last evening (Sunday 21:39) -
let me try again

JohnnyB


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> [mailto:dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:47 PM
> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> Subject: Re: [Dixonary] New word???
>
> No. I got an automated ack for the winner notification I sent
> when I posted the results, so Johnny is aware that the deal
> is his. That ack arrived at
> 20h29 GMT on Sunday evening 30/5.
>
> Today is a UK bank holiday so Johnny may have been away for
> the weekend.
>
> --
> Paul Keating
> The Hague
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dodi Schultz
> To: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:39 PM
> Subject: [Dixonary] New word???
>
>
>
> I think it's well over 30 hours since Paul posted results of
> round 2109.
>
> Has anybody seen a new word?
>
> --Dodi
>

[JohnnyB]

Paul and everyone

The original message message was in the moderate messages marked as 'maybe
spam' - I have received no warning from G-groups about moderating mail and
there was another message there too from an unknown also requiring
moderation - that was spam - The message I posted originally was via an
account marked as a member - and has previously been allowed via an "allow
all" which in theory means that no messages from that address are prevented.

Obviously G-groups is playing silly-whatsits - it accepted the second
(retry) message no problems

Did any other moderator get warning of mail requiring moderating?

JohnnyB

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> [mailto:dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:47 PM
> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> Subject: Re: [Dixonary] New word???
>
> No. I got an automated ack for the winner notification I sent
> when I posted the results, so Johnny is aware that the deal
> is his. That ack arrived at
> 20h29 GMT on Sunday evening 30/5.
>
> Today is a UK bank holiday so Johnny may have been away for
> the weekend.
>
> --
> Paul Keating
> The Hague
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dodi Schultz
> To: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:39 PM
> Subject: [Dixonary] New word???
>
>
>
> I think it's well over 30 hours since Paul posted results of
> round 2109.
>
> Has anybody seen a new word?y
>
> --Dodi
>

[Daniel B. Widdis]

JB> I posted a new word at 9:39 last evening (Sunday 21:39).

And the original post arrived 6 minutes after your repost. Perhaps it was
going through security at a nearby airport.

--
Dan

[Hugo Kornelis]

Hi Johnny,

I did not get a mail about your message in the moderation queue. If I had,
it would have been released immediately.

Best, Hugo



----- Original Message -----
From: "JohnnyB" <johnnybarrs (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
To: <dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 7:34 PM
Subject: RE: [Dixonary] New word???


> Paul and everyone
>
> The original message message was in the moderate messages marked as 'maybe
> spam' - I have received no warning from G-groups about moderating mail
> and
> there was another message there too from an unknown also requiring
> moderation - that was spam - The message I posted originally was via an
> account marked as a member - and has previously been allowed via an "allow
> all" which in theory means that no messages from that address are
> prevented.
>
> Obviously G-groups is playing silly-whatsits - it accepted the second
> (retry) message no problems
>
> Did any other moderator get warning of mail requiring moderating?
>
> JohnnyB
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
>> [mailto:dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
>> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:47 PM
>> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
>> Subject: Re: [Dixonary] New word???
>>
>> No. I got an automated ack for the winner notification I sent
>> when I posted the results, so Johnny is aware that the deal
>> is his. That ack arrived at
>> 20h29 GMT on Sunday evening 30/5.
>>
>> Today is a UK bank holiday so Johnny may have been away for
>> the weekend.
>>
>> --
>> Paul Keating
>> The Hague
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Dodi Schultz
>> To: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
>> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 4:39 PM
>> Subject: [Dixonary] New word???
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it's well over 30 hours since Paul posted results of
>> round 2109.
>>
>> Has anybody seen a new word?y
>>
>> --Dodi
>>
>

[Daniel B. Widdis]

JB> Did any other moderator get warning of mail requiring moderating?

Nothing here.

JB> Obviously G-groups is playing silly-whatsits - it accepted the second
JB> (retry) message no problems

From a different address. It may not like your .co.uk variant. Although
one would think that being a member of the list, with previous posts
accepted, would whitelist you.

--
Dan

[Dodi Schultz]

> JB> I posted a new word at 9:39 last evening (Sunday 21:39).
>
> DW> And the original post arrived 6 minutes after your repost. Perhaps
> it was going through security at a nearby airport.

In my case, the original arrived *three hours* after the repost. But of
course security precautions are much more stringent here in New York,
and the original may have had a suspicion-provoking air about it.

--Dodi

[Daniel B. Widdis]

DS> the original may have had a suspicion-provoking air about it.

He did list the time zones for Moscow and Baghdad.

--
Dan

[Dodi Schultz]

> DS> the original may have had a suspicion-provoking air about it.
>
>
>
> He did list the time zones for Moscow and Baghdad...
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dan
>

AHA! ;-)

[JohnnyB]

Dan and Dodi

I usually do list Moscow and Baghdad -- or at least I did when we had a
player in the region - and I did with the repost

Don't ask me what happened - I only posted a word

JohnnyB

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> [mailto:dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com] On Behalf Of Dodi Schultz
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:40 PM
> To: dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> Subject: Re: [Dixonary] New word???
>
>
> DS> the original may have had a suspicion-provoking air
> about it.
>
>
>
> He did list the time zones for Moscow and Baghdad.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Dan
>
>
> AHA! ;-)
>
>
>
>
>

[Dodi Schultz]

JohnnyB wrote:

> I usually do list Moscow and Baghdad -- or at least I did when we had a
> player in the region . . .

We DID?

Yikes! My memory's failing. Who?

--Dodi

[Daniel B. Widdis]

DS> We DID?
DS> Yikes! My memory's failing. Who?

Me, back in 2006-07.

--
Dan

[Dodi Schultz]

Daniel B. Widdis wrote:
> DS> We DID?
> DS> Yikes! My memory's failing. Who?
>
> Me, back in 2006-07.
>

Oh, geez. Of course; you were in Iraq. Johnny mentioned Turkey, and I
was trying to recall . . .

--Dodi