View Full Version : RE: [Dixonary] CWM 1631 Results!!
Judy Madnick
July 30th, 2005, 08:53 AM
Out of curiosity -- according to http://www.acronymfinder.com there are no fewer than 21 results for "CWM." I've often worried that a word I might choose as dealer (ancient history at this point -- LOL!) could have definitions besides the one I might be using. Is that a problem?
Judy Madnick
Albany, NY
dcunningham47
July 30th, 2005, 09:51 AM
--- In coryphaeus (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "Judy Madnick" <email@j...> wrote:
> Out of curiosity -- according to http://www.acronymfinder.com there
are no fewer than 21 results for "CWM." I've often worried that a word
I might choose as dealer (ancient history at this point -- LOL!) could
have definitions besides the one I might be using. Is that a problem?
>
> Judy Madnick
> Albany, NY
It certainly has occurred in the past that two or more definitions
posted were found in dictionaries!! Once I think three of the defs
wer correct :(
I mentioned "acronyms" only to avoid the possiblity that every single
definition would be Welsh <g>.
Dave
Judy Madnick
July 30th, 2005, 10:08 AM
----- Original message ----------------------------------------
From: dcunningham47 <dcunningham47 (AT) yahoo (DOT) com>
Subject: Re: [Dixonary] CWM 1631 Results!!
<< It certainly has occurred in the past that two or more definitions
<< posted were found in dictionaries!! Once I think three of the defs
<< wer correct :(
How was that handled?
<< I mentioned "acronyms" only to avoid the possiblity that every single
<< definition would be Welsh <g>.
Only a couple of us fell for that one. <G>
Judy Madnick
Albany, NY
Wayne Scott
July 30th, 2005, 11:44 AM
--- In coryphaeus (AT) yahoogroups (DOT) com, "Judy Madnick" <email@j...> wrote:
> Out of curiosity -- according to http://www.acronymfinder.com there
are no fewer than 21 results for "CWM." I've often worried that a word
I might choose as dealer (ancient history at this point -- LOL!) could
have definitions besides the one I might be using. Is that a problem?
>
> Judy Madnick
> Albany, NY
It certainly has occurred in the past that two or more definitions
posted were found in dictionaries!! Once I think three of the defs
wer correct :(
I mentioned "acronyms" only to avoid the possiblity that every single
definition would be Welsh <g>.
Dave
You're "clever" deceit makes my acronym, #4, meant to describe the D in P, even more accurate.
Dave Cunningham
July 30th, 2005, 11:53 AM
Only the def submitted by the dealer is the "correct" one for scoring ... though I was astounded when, after voting and looking up the word, the dealer's def was not the one from the AHD at all :(
Paul Keating
July 31st, 2005, 02:15 AM
Yes, it is.
That is why I generally cross-check against a range of dictionaries to
make sure that I don't do this accidentally. It's a bit of a dilemma
when you put up sense A and a player confidently and correctly DQs on
sense B, which is the only sense given in some other dictionary. It gets
even worse when another player concocts a phoney def close to sense B.
Judy Madnick wrote:
>Out of curiosity -- according to http://www.acronymfinder.com there are no fewer than 21 results for "CWM." I've often worried that a word I might choose as dealer (ancient history at this point -- LOL!) could have definitions besides the one I might be using. Is that a problem?
>
--
Paul Keating
The Hague
52N02 4E19
--
This message was checked before sending and is believed to be virus-free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date: 2005-07-28
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.