Dodi Schultz
July 28th, 2005, 11:06 AM
Paul writes,
>> The rules do not say that the definition in its entirety is to be
>> drawn from a single dictionary (though I grant you that the
>> implication, or at least the drafters' expectation, is there). Rule
>> 4 is about editing defs, not about selecting them, and this rule
>> tells dealers not to take unwarranted liberties with the dictionary
>> editors' wording. Which I didn't.
>>
>> So I think I am within both the letter and the spirit of the rules.
>> Only just, maybe, but within.
Hey, whatever the group thinks! (Since Rules Mother left the game a long
time ago.)
To me, it's a GAME, and the dealer plucks A def from A dictionary; it's not
about exhaustive linguistic research. YMMV.
--Dodi
>> The rules do not say that the definition in its entirety is to be
>> drawn from a single dictionary (though I grant you that the
>> implication, or at least the drafters' expectation, is there). Rule
>> 4 is about editing defs, not about selecting them, and this rule
>> tells dealers not to take unwarranted liberties with the dictionary
>> editors' wording. Which I didn't.
>>
>> So I think I am within both the letter and the spirit of the rules.
>> Only just, maybe, but within.
Hey, whatever the group thinks! (Since Rules Mother left the game a long
time ago.)
To me, it's a GAME, and the dealer plucks A def from A dictionary; it's not
about exhaustive linguistic research. YMMV.
--Dodi