PDA

View Full Version : Round 2002: FOMA


Daniel Widdis
May 6th, 2009, 07:03 PM
When dealing round 1961, Bill Hirst noted that the round number could read the same upside down and noted that wouldn't occur again until round 6009.

I argued that if one used an OCR font, or read the numbers on an LCD display, that 2002 would be the next ambigram round. Appropriate that I end up dealing it.

Or since it's numbers, not letters, would it be ambinumeric? Is that even a word? Perhaps not. But this is:

The word for round 2002 is

*** FOMA ***

As usual, capitalization is not significant.

Please send me your fabulous, fanciful, fake, fictitious, fairy-tale, fabricated, false, fantastical, forged, fabled, far fetched, fraudulent, flim flam, feigned, fanatical, and figmental definitions by private reply to this message.
- Users of the Tapcis Forum at www.tapcis.com may click on my name and "Send email to Daniel Widdis".
- Mailing list players may email me at: widdis@gmail.com

Definitions will be collected until 5am PDT on Friday, March 8, which is approximately 36 hours from now. (That's 8am EDT, and 12.00 UTC/GMT, as well as Julian Date 2454960.00000 or 1241784000 seconds after midnight GMT Jan 1, 1970 for those of you using *nix machines.)

Daniel B. Widdis
May 6th, 2009, 09:43 PM
DW> Friday, March 8

Clearly I meant May 8.

--
Dan

Dave Cunningham
May 7th, 2009, 08:31 AM
Prior, such as British Guiana is the foma name of Guyana.

NAD

On May 6, 8:03*pm, Daniel Widdis <wid... (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:
> When dealing round 1961, Bill Hirst noted that the round number could
> read the same upside down and noted that wouldn't occur again until
> round 6009.
>
> I argued that if one used an OCR font, or read the numbers on an LCD
> display, that 2002 would be the next ambigram round. *Appropriate that I
> end up dealing it.
>
> Or since it's numbers, not letters, would it be ambinumeric? *Is that
> even a word? *Perhaps not. *But this is:
>
> The word for round 2002 is
>
> *** FOMA ***
>
> As usual, capitalization is not significant.
>
> Please send me your fabulous, fanciful, fake, fictitious, fairy-tale,
> fabricated, false, fantastical, forged, fabled, far fetched, fraudulent,
> flim flam, feigned, fanatical, and figmental definitions by private
> reply to this message.
> - Users of the Tapcis Forum atwww.tapcis.commay click on my name and
> "Send email to Daniel Widdis".
> - Mailing list players may email me at: wid... (AT) gmail (DOT) com
>
> Definitions will be collected until 5am PDT on Friday, March 8, which
> is approximately 36 hours from now. (That's 8am EDT, and 12.00 UTC/GMT,
> as well as Julian Date 2454960.00000 or 1241784000 seconds after
> midnight GMT Jan 1, 1970 for those of you using *nix machines.)
>
> --
> Daniel Widdis