PDA

View Full Version : [Dixonary] FRUTEX, the DQ


Toni Savage
January 9th, 2009, 03:13 PM
Don't worry about it... a lot of people had voted already. DAn, IIRC, the last time only a few had voted, so it made sense to start over.

-- Toni Savage


--- On Fri, 1/9/09, JohnnyB <johnnybarrs (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

> From: JohnnyB <johnnybarrs (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
> Subject: [Dixonary] Re: FRUTEX, the VOTE
> To: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> Date: Friday, January 9, 2009, 4:05 PM
> People
>
> I am tired and with flu on top of my CFS so I decided to go
> with a DQ - I
> couldn’t think straight
>
> In fact as I pointed out by outbox shows that I sent only
> to Toni... But I
> was sending using my own machine from an internet café so
> maybe records are
> incomplete
>
> - nevertheless, I am not sure if that it is right as a DQ
> anyway ... As I
> said to Toni on submitting my def, the technical botanical
> term, BY
> DEFINITION, does NOT mean an ordinary bush, it means the
> kind of secondary
> structures which enable short-lasting perennial stems which
> are specifically
> not those which a bush (technical definition) has - so I
> was in fact dipping
> out
>
> So, I am sorry for messing up a deal - certainly not my
> intention - and it
> has cost me more thought and effort than I considered that
> I had available
>
> JohnnyB
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> > [mailto:Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com] On Behalf Of
> Christopher Carson
> > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:36 PM
> > To: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> > Subject: [Dixonary] Re: FRUTEX, the VOTE
> >
> >
> > I would be inclined to just score the partial round
> and let
> > it go at that ... uh ... wait ... that wouldn't
> give me the
> > deal, would it?
> >
> > CC
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.5/1881 -
> Release
> > Date: 09/01/2009 08:38
> >