Round 1919 rolling scores

[mshefler]

5-Round 4-Rnd Round Round Round Round Round
Player TOTAL 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919
------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Heimerson, R............ 16 12 4 2* 2 5* 3*
Widdis, D............... 14 12 2 6 D 1 2 4
Shefler, M.............. 14 12 2 0 3 9* D 9
Schultz, D.............. 14 12 2 2 2 4* 4*
Barrs, J................ 13 13 DQ 0 DQ 2 9* D 5 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stevens, G.............. 11 10 1 0 1 7 2*
Abell, T................ 10 4 6 D 3 1 2* 1
Madnick, J.............. 9 8 1 2 2 1 3*
Emery, C................ 9 8 1 1 1 2 4*
Cunningham, D........... 8 6 2 2* 1 2 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carson, C............... 8 6 2 3 1 2* 0
Lodge, T................ 7 7 3* 1 0 3*
Hirst, B................ 7 7 0 3 4 0 0
Hart, J................. 7 2 5 2 0
Weltz, D................ 6 6 0 0 2 4*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Savage, T............... 6 5 1 2 1 1 1
Crom, S................. 5 3 2 0 0 0 3*
Bourne, T............... 5 4 1 2 1 1
Shepherdson, N.......... 4 4 0 0 1 1 2*
Keating, P.............. 4 4 D 0 4
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott, W................ 0 0 0

[JohnnyB]

Mike

>Submitter: Barrs Vote: N/V

My "sent mail" shows that I did vote on Wednesday at 10:11 my time ---
hiwever, it does not appear to be on the group - did anyone else see it

>I'll go for a short and a long near the middle - #8 and #9 please

In fact it doesn't change the result so it doesn't matter in that sense

JohnnyB

[stamps]

I'll update the records to reflect your vote.

Mike


----------------------------------------------
Salsgiver Internet Services Webmail
Save up to 50% on a new dial-up account.
Find out more at http://services.salsgiver.com



---------- Original Message -----------
From: "JohnnyB" <johnnybarrs (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
To: <Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Sent: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:32:04 +0100
Subject: [Dixonary] Re: Round 1919 results

> Mike
>
> >Submitter: Barrs Vote: N/V
>
> My "sent mail" shows that I did vote on Wednesday at 10:11 my time --
> - hiwever, it does not appear to be on the group - did anyone else
> see it
>
> >I'll go for a short and a long near the middle - #8 and #9 please
>
> In fact it doesn't change the result so it doesn't matter in that sense
>
> JohnnyB
------- End of Original Message -------

[Hugo Kornelis]

Hi Johnny,

I've got a copy of that mesage in my inbox.

Best, Hugo


----- Original Message -----
From: "JohnnyB" <johnnybarrs (AT) gmail (DOT) com>
To: <Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com>
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 7:32 PM
Subject: [Dixonary] Re: Round 1919 results


>
> Mike
>
>>Submitter: Barrs Vote: N/V
>
> My "sent mail" shows that I did vote on Wednesday at 10:11 my time ---
> hiwever, it does not appear to be on the group - did anyone else see it
>
>>I'll go for a short and a long near the middle - #8 and #9 please
>
> In fact it doesn't change the result so it doesn't matter in that sense
>
> JohnnyB
>
>

[Guerri Stevens]

Mike, Johnny B. also voted for #8. That gives me an unnatural 5. Hmm,
maybe I shouldn't have mentioned it <g>.

Guerri

mshefler wrote:
> The dictionary, having won by a large margin, unfortunately declines to
> deal,
> so that unhappy task falls to 2nd place holder Dan Widdis, the only
> natural
> among a bunch of unnatural fours.


> 8. Forthright.
> Submitter: Stevens Votes: *10* & 14 2 + 2 = 4
> Voted for by: Cunningham; Carson

[JohnnyB]

Guerri

I think you are alright 'cos I my other vote was for Dan's #9 -- so his is
now a natuaral 5 to counter your unnatural 5 and he remains Da Dealer with
you as an uncontested Real Winnah

JohnnyB

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> [mailto:Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com] On Behalf Of Guerri Stevens
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 7:31 PM
> To: Dixonary (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com
> Subject: [Dixonary] Re: Round 1919 results
>
>
> Mike, Johnny B. also voted for #8. That gives me an unnatural
> 5. Hmm, maybe I shouldn't have mentioned it <g>.
>
> Guerri
>
> mshefler wrote:
> > The dictionary, having won by a large margin, unfortunately
> declines
> > to deal, so that unhappy task falls to 2nd place holder Dan Widdis,
> > the only natural among a bunch of unnatural fours.
>
>
> > 8. Forthright.
> > Submitter: Stevens Votes: *10* & 14 2 + 2 = 4
> > Voted for by: Cunningham; Carson
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1531 - Release
> Date: 02/07/2008 19:02
>

[Judy Madnick]

Yea! I'm finally out of the "cellar"!

Happy 4th of July to all who celebrate -- and even to all who don't, since they *do* also have a July 4th. LOL!

Judy Madnick, Tupperware Consultant
Ask me how you can earn free Tupperware!

http://my.tupperware.com/judymadnick

[Guerri Stevens]

Whew! I didn't even check on your other vote before writing my message.

Guerri

JohnnyB wrote:
> Guerri
>
> I think you are alright 'cos I my other vote was for Dan's #9 -- so his is
> now a natuaral 5 to counter your unnatural 5 and he remains Da Dealer with
> you as an uncontested Real Winnah