Dodi Schultz
July 7th, 2005, 01:08 AM
About my wondering what Dave was referring to, Dan writes,
>> First, it chronologically followed Mike Shefler's complaint of
>> sending in a def for kif and not having it postedOr, in the internet
>> headers, it contains the line:
Not in my mailbox, it didn't.
>> References: <Dave.Cunningham.1rq5b5 (AT) no-mx (DOT) www.tapcis.com/forums>
>> <mshefler.1rr85a (AT) no-mx (DOT) www.tapcis.com/forums>
>>
>> That is the information that thread-aware browsers (and tapcis.com)
>> use to piece together threads and replies. You can see from here
>> that it was a reply to a message posted by "mshefler". (The other
>> referenced message is the original posting, "grandparent" of the
>> message in the thread.)
C'mon Dan. Are you serious? You really expect people to study Internet
routing text to find out what the heck a message is about?
< sigh >
--Dodi
>> First, it chronologically followed Mike Shefler's complaint of
>> sending in a def for kif and not having it postedOr, in the internet
>> headers, it contains the line:
Not in my mailbox, it didn't.
>> References: <Dave.Cunningham.1rq5b5 (AT) no-mx (DOT) www.tapcis.com/forums>
>> <mshefler.1rr85a (AT) no-mx (DOT) www.tapcis.com/forums>
>>
>> That is the information that thread-aware browsers (and tapcis.com)
>> use to piece together threads and replies. You can see from here
>> that it was a reply to a message posted by "mshefler". (The other
>> referenced message is the original posting, "grandparent" of the
>> message in the thread.)
C'mon Dan. Are you serious? You really expect people to study Internet
routing text to find out what the heck a message is about?
< sigh >
--Dodi