eminent domain ends war on terror

[davidh]

Pres. Bush today decides to follow the example of PM Sharon in Gush Katif, Israel.

The federal government will take possession of Gulfport, Miss. and compensate the casino owners and residents, etc. for their property. This land will be turned over to the control of Bin Laden, Mullah Omar, and Al Zarqawi in return for signing a peace treaty with the USA.

This year is expected to be a very good year for hurricanes. Therefore the government is expecting that a cat 5 hurricane will destroy the Al Qaida base before the terrorists have time to import and install nuclear armed missles, from North Korea and/or Iran, or other WMD's.

However, if the appropriate storm does not appear, the gov't will have to divert resources from it's secret UFO project in order to generate an artificial hurricane or artificial asteroid impact to neutralize the terrorist base, as an apparent act of God, to defuse or delay terrorist retaliation.

David H. former undercover reporter for Mad Magazine.

[Judy G. Russell]

Okay... let's have it... what are you smoking? I want some!

[Addendum: I have this mental image of Google picking up this message and this turning into the next great conspiracy theory of the internet...]

[Mike]

Oh, that would have a certain satisfaction about it, no?

[Judy G. Russell]

What do you want to make a bet -- give it six days and it'll be reported by the lunatic fringe as the truth because they "read it on the Internet"!

[davidh]

What do you want to make a bet -- give it six days and it'll be reported by the lunatic fringe as the truth because they "read it on the Internet"!

Ouch! Bad timing. I wouldn't be surprised now if the Chief Cook and Bottle Washer now gets a call from the Dept. of Homeland Security. And you cooks probably have TAPCIS archives of all my subversive recipes since I started using TAPCIS forum in 1996, to turn over to the FBI. :-(

David H.

[Judy G. Russell]

And you cooks probably have TAPCIS archives of all my subversive recipes since I started using TAPCIS forum in 1996, to turn over to the FBI. :-(
Heh heh heh... how much is it worth to you for me to go to jail rather than turn over our archives?

[davidh]

How about a year's supply of chocolate chip cookies?

[Judy G. Russell]

Hmmm... you're headed in the right direction! But a year is such a short time at this stage of my life...

[Mike]

If that long!

[Bill Hirst]

Which secret UFO program would that be? The UFOs at Area 51 or the Men in Black UFOs?

[davidh]

Men in Black UFOs?

I think some of the MIB in the courts are from another planet or at least not the same planet I came from (which I forgot).

David H.

[davidh]

I think some of the MIB in the courts are from another planet or at least not the same planet I came from (which I forgot).

David H.

What's next? Will Supreme Court eventually "endorse" "snuff" films?

Pro-privacy view
http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20050131.html
QUOTE
Let's hope that Judge Lancaster's novel approach can shock other judges into realizing what they've already known: Obscenity law is unconstitutional for multiple reasons - it strikes blows to fairness, free speech, and sexual privacy, as well.
UNQUOTE

Anti-obscenity view
http://capwiz.com/joycemeyer/issues/alert/?alertid=7231876
QUOTE
The U.S. Justice Department brought a ten-count indictment against Extreme Associates for producing films “even porn veterans find disturbing.” These films’ creators boasted that the films depicted rape, torture, and murder and represented “the depths of human depravity,” and they proudly announced that the ones involved in the indictment met the legal definition of obscenity.
UNQUOTE

Makes me wonder. If a film records actual real rape, torture and murder would it make any difference about whether it should be sold for private viewing in the USA? Or would it make any difference if it were filmed in California versus Mexico, for example?

Perhaps if someone threatens violence to some person or group in a chat room and I report their threats to the police, they should have the right to sue me for violation of privacy damages in civil court, regardless of whether they are terrorists, mafia, or pranksters?

David H.

[chm]

LOL!

Too bad it can't really be done.

[Bill Hirst]

If a film records actual real rape, torture and murder would it make any difference....

Actual rape, torture and murder is adequately covered on the evening news so small children can watch. Fake rape, torture and murder must be restricted to late night cable TV when small children will not be exposed to such disturbing material.