Scott Crom
July 28th, 2006, 03:57 PM
Judy - No, I didn't know that off the top of my head.
Keep reading...
Mike, thanks very much for the additional information. It sent me
to my bookshelf to hunt for the book by G.H. Hardy in which he
reports visiting Ramanujan in the hospital. Ramanujan asks him
the number of the taxicab in which Hardy came to the hospital. It
was 1729, and Ramanujan then comments on the properties of that
number.
Unfortunately I couldn't find the book!
At least that helps explain why such numbers are called "taxicab
numbers."
And apparently my very fallible memory dropped "smallest" and
replaced it with "only."
I did just now check out the URL you supplied--fascinating stuff!
Scott
Keep reading...
Mike, thanks very much for the additional information. It sent me
to my bookshelf to hunt for the book by G.H. Hardy in which he
reports visiting Ramanujan in the hospital. Ramanujan asks him
the number of the taxicab in which Hardy came to the hospital. It
was 1729, and Ramanujan then comments on the properties of that
number.
Unfortunately I couldn't find the book!
At least that helps explain why such numbers are called "taxicab
numbers."
And apparently my very fallible memory dropped "smallest" and
replaced it with "only."
I did just now check out the URL you supplied--fascinating stuff!
Scott