PDA

View Full Version : [Dixonary] FOIN


Frances Wetzstein
December 14th, 2005, 06:40 PM
You guys are absolutely right about the date.

I am so ashamed I don't know what to say. Maybe I could start all over again with a new deadline which would allow those folks who didn't get their definitions in (due to my error) to do so.

I don't know if this would be possible or not, but I'd be willing if it is. Can someone advise me about this? Or maybe it's better to let sleeping dogs lie.

I must admit between having a new browser and a new email and not having dealt for a very, very long time, this round has been a nightmare. And it's not over yet!!!



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/kTUslB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Tony Abell
December 14th, 2005, 10:30 PM
On 2005-12-14 at 19:40 Frances Wetzstein wrote:

FW> You guys are absolutely right about the date.

FW> I am so ashamed I don't know what to say. Maybe I could start
FW> all over again with a new deadline which would allow those folks
FW> who didn't get their definitions in (due to my error) to do so.

I'd be inclined to just let the current round for FOIN continue as is
since we've come so far at this point. Maybe you could award dealer
points to those who intended to submit definitions but were prevented
from doing so by the premature presentation of definitions. Or maybe
you'd rather not go there, given that dealer points are not mentioned
in the rules (though if they were, this sort of situation would seem
to be an occasion for their use, if any would).




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/kTUslB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->

Daniel B. Widdis
December 15th, 2005, 11:54 AM
I'm inclined to agree with Tony here.

On 12/14/05, Tony Abell <aabell (AT) compuserve (DOT) com> wrote:
>
>
> I'd be inclined to just let the current round for FOIN continue as is
> since we've come so far at this point. Maybe you could award dealer
> points to those who intended to submit definitions but were prevented
> from doing so by the premature presentation of definitions.




--
Dan Widdis


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/kTUslB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->