PDA

View Full Version : [Dixonary] Round 2485: ADHORN [Progress]


Paul Keating
February 22nd, 2014, 04:27 PM
This appears to be an uninspiring or unappealing word, because so far, only
ten definitions have been received, from the following players:

John Barrs, Tim Bourne, Chris Carson, Dave Cunningham, Keith Hale, Tim
Lodge, Judy Madnick, Mike Shefler, Guerri Stevens and Dick Weltz.

If your name is in the list, this posting should come as no surprise,
because you will have received an individual acknowledgement. But if your
name is not in the list, it probably indicates that your def is trapped in
a spam filter, rather than nondelivery. If you simply resubmit your def,
the resubmission may suffer the same fate. Instead or as well, please draw
my attention to the problem in a public message.

The word, in case you missed the initial posting, is ADHORN: capitalization
is not significant. You still have twelve hours to submit your fake
definitions for this word, which you should of course send me *by email*,
to 2485-adhorn (AT) boargules (DOT) com.

The deadline for submissions is on Sunday 23 February 2014 at

02:30 PST (in the morning)
03:30 MST
04:30 CST
05:30 EST
10:30 GMT/UTC
11:30 CET for me
and 21:30 EDT in Melbourne.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Dodi Schultz
February 22nd, 2014, 04:53 PM
On 2/22/2014 5:27 PM, Paul Keating wrote:
> This appears to be an uninspiring or unappealing word, because so far,
> only ten definitions have been received . . .

I can't speak for anyone else, but be assured that at least in the case of
the undersigned, the lack of inspiration is entirely at this end. :-( But
we still have eleven-plus hours, by my count.

--Dodi



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Efrem Mallach
February 22nd, 2014, 05:11 PM
My situation as well, but alas, with the deadline being at 5:30 am in my (our) time zone, I hope to spend a large chunk of those eleven hours sound asleep!

Efrem

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Feb 22, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Dodi Schultz <DodiSchultz (AT) verizon (DOT) net> wrote:

> On 2/22/2014 5:27 PM, Paul Keating wrote:
>> This appears to be an uninspiring or unappealing word, because so far, only ten definitions have been received . . .
>
> I can't speak for anyone else, but be assured that at least in the case of the undersigned, the lack of inspiration is entirely at this end. :-( But we still have eleven-plus hours, by my count.
>
> --Dodi

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Daniel Widdis
February 22nd, 2014, 10:43 PM
I spent more time thinking of a NAD (that I never posted) than I did my
fake def. I blame the dealer for picking an easily-NAD'd word that
begs one to go a bit beyond the obvious.

On 2/22/14, 2:27 PM, Paul Keating wrote:
> This appears to be an uninspiring or unappealing word, because so far,
> only ten definitions have been received

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Efrem Mallach
February 22nd, 2014, 10:59 PM
Amen to that too. My unposted NAD was "to dhecorate." Yours couldn't be worse.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
On Feb 22, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Daniel Widdis <widdis (AT) dixonary (DOT) net> wrote:

> I spent more time thinking of a NAD (that I never posted) than I did my fake def. I blame the dealer for picking an easily-NAD'd word that begs one to go a bit beyond the obvious.
>
> On 2/22/14, 2:27 PM, Paul Keating wrote:
>> This appears to be an uninspiring or unappealing word, because so far, only ten definitions have been received
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dixonary" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dixonary+unsubscribe (AT) googlegroups (DOT) com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.